GD doesn't always accept revocations
jharris at widomaker.com
Thu Feb 10 02:25:42 CET 2005
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:29:28PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:38:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:
> > If this isn't already self-evident to them...
> Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. If you just want to complain, then I
> guess you're all set. If you want something actually fixed you should
> tell them.
I wasn't complaining. I had a valid question about why the GD wasn't
accepting a 0x20 signature and we had a productive conversation about it.
I think this particular keyholder DTRT by sending their revoked key to
a keyserver that would accept it, and I hope more people read this thread
and come to the same conclusion.
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050209/dd7e66ac/attachment.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users