Newsgroup signing error
Stewart V. Wright
swright at physics.adelaide.edu.au
Thu Feb 17 01:32:35 CET 2005
* Jason Barnett <jason.barnett at telesuite.com> [050216 17:55]:
> This makes sense (wish I had read this before my last message to this
> group!). I have been using PGP/MIME rather than clear-signed messages
> all along.
Without wanting to start too much of a argument, it seems from my
reading that the preferred way of sending messages should be
PGP/MIME. The benefits over inline signatures, including being able
to include attachments in the signed message and non-ASCII characters
However, many people will disagree...
> > P.P.S I'm intrigued. Does your mailer verify my signature
> > as the previous line ended with a couple of spaces.
> FYI Thunderbird / Enigmail 0.90.1.1 verified your signature as
> "UNTRUSTED Good signature from Stewart V. Wright
> <swright at physics.adelaide.edu.au>"
Well, as they say "every cloud has a silver lining" and at least
Thunderbird / Enigmail does the right thing for properly formatted
You can now trust what we tell you, even if we can't trust your
Good luck with finding a solution.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 274 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050216/2b0827fc/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users