SHA1 broken?
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Fri Feb 18 16:01:46 CET 2005
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:05:56 -0500, Jason Harris said:
> If RSA key material can be successfully manipulated to produce a
> desired result in a v3 key, why can't it also be manipulated in
> a v4 key? Granted, the desired result is a SHA-1 collision, but
Because the v4 format fixes the flaw with the length of the parameters
and the way the fingerprint and keyid is calculated.
> Of course. However, if the key creation time, type, and number of
> bits are checked, they may be found to be different among keys with
Well that means to reintroduce the requirement for that checking for
v4 keys again. For a different reason of course. And well, with the
SHA-1 weakness you still won't be able to find a second preimage for a
given key.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list