auto sign files

Thomas Sjögren thomas at
Tue Jan 18 13:47:44 CET 2005

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:33:18PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> Just reading the script will be enough to identify 
> the passphrase. Therefore automated signatures give a FALSE sense of 
> security. As soon as the machine is compromised, the script is readable, the 
> key identifiable, the passphrase known. oops.

Not supporting automating signatures but SHC[1] might be worth checking
out. got an article[2] about it as well.


== Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050118/164a0502/attachment.pgp

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list