Filename for digests

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at turnstep.com
Sun Jul 17 00:44:52 CEST 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Yes, I agree that the standard format is the best one to use, but I was
> asking about the name of the file, not it's format. For example, if I'm
> going to share a directory with 1000 files, it would be inconvenient to
> save each file's hash as a separate file, and just add a .sha1 extension
> (resulting in 2000 files). So therefore I would store all the hashes in
> one file. But what should this file be called? sha1sums? hashes.sha1?
> digests.sha1? Is the .sha1 extension important?

One pseudo-standard in place is to use uppercase for important meta-files
like README and INSTALL. One named "CHECKSUMS" or "CHECKSUMS.sha1"
should stand out enough. A signed version could be "CHECKSUMS.asc"
or even CHECKSUMS.sha1.asc, etc.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200507161841
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFC2Y17vJuQZxSWSsgRAlARAJ4rgI4amLy3jfDgPWIWOj33ol0QSACghMTD
LgU99YprF5R5+pT/zCnd7SU=
=m9Bz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list