GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Jun 6 15:42:49 CEST 2005
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 13:45:30 +0200, Kiefer, Sascha said:
> Well, as far as i see there is no difference between the MIME format of
> rfc2015 and rfc3156.
Correct, 3156 has only minor clarifications.
> So, what is right?
> RFC like:
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=bar
> Or (enigmail like)
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
Wrong. IIRC this is a workaround due to problems with the Mozilla
code. Enigmail users should nag the Mozilla hackers to provide a
working and useful interface to MIME and don't hardcode S/MIME.
> But what should i generate?
The first of course.
More information about the Gnupg-users