Retaining expired sigs

[David Shaw]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:

> As you seem to have concluded, that fact takes precedence in my
> logic, and as I have concluded, it seems to take no precedence in
> yours.

I can only conclude that we are talking completely past one another.
You do seem to be very upset about all this, but I'm not detecting any
more signal amidst the noise.  I'm afraid I need to drop out of this
thread as I'm not really sure what you are advocating, or why, or if
you're just arguing to argue.  I'm genuinely sorry you don't seem to
be parsing what I'm saying, but there is nowhere else to go at this
point.

If you have an actual change suggestion, I'd love to hear it.  But I
really do need:

1) What you think the current behavior is
2) What you want it to be
3) Why you feel this is better

David