Shouldn't keyservers store and provide subkeys?

[Randy Burns]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:04:52 GMT, Adam Funk said:
> 
> > one at home).  Then I tried to update each machine to have the new
> > public subkeys (using pgp.mit.edu):
> 
> That keyserver as well as all other servers running the old HKS
> software are broken.  YOu should move away from that keyserver and
> use an SKS one (e.g. random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de) or at least
> those at subkeys.pgp.net.
> 
> BTW, to avoid answering these questions over and over, should we
> just setup working keyservers under the gnupg.net domain?  It seems
> the old and broken pgp.net servers will never vanish.
> 
> 
> Shalom-Salam,
> 
>    Werner
> 

I think that's a great idea. I assume there would be a web
interface, as well. What about a search option for the web interface
that excludes any expired keys? by means of a check-box, like the
check-box for "verbose" on some web keyservers. Maybe that's harder
than it sounds, but I'd like that. :-)

Randy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.40
Comment: Public Keys: www.geocities.com/burns98/pgp

iD8DBQFCQxoUO1wFkBRYxW8RAyB9AKD38kkR05jRFBYIanL5dh4dn9rqUwCgy4Wr
N9OAelepCsEwouRbJNAgzfo=
=WPAl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----