[Sks-devel] stripping GD sigs (was: Re: clean sigs)

Jason Harris jharris at widomaker.com
Fri Sep 9 15:30:35 CEST 2005

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:31:35AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:22:00AM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:

[I'll address your other points later.]
> If you insist on presenting a different view to users than the entire
> rest of the keyserver net, without any way to turn such a "feature"
> off, then I suggest that keyserver.kjsl.com be removed from the
> subkeys.pgp.net rotation.  It will cause more confusion than benefit.

I pointed out the potential for confusion before.  But, now, I'm
convinced the best solution _is_ to remove the GD sigs from non-
GD keyservers.  Also, subkeys.pgp.net is about _subkeys_.  If you
want gd-retention.pgp.net, go ahead and ask Piete to create it,
then configure GPG to use it by default.

As well, please give OpenPGP users more credit.  They seem to be
quite capable of comprehending the differences among keyservers.

Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050909/cca1d993/attachment.pgp

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list