dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Mon Sep 12 05:01:22 CEST 2005
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:59:53AM -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
> > There is perhaps an argument to be made for a "super clean" that does
> > clean and also removes any signature where the signing key is not
> > present (in fact, an early version of clean did that), but that's a
> > different thing than clean.
> Perhaps --scrub ? --sanitize ? --disinfect ?
I rather like "minimize", but this isn't really a minimal key (as it
has signatures other than selfsigs).
More information about the Gnupg-users