1.4.3 // proper syntax for --edit-key cross-certify ?

[Charly Avital]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

John W. Moore III wrote the following on 4/5/06 7:13 PM:
[...]

> Had you chosen to 'save' the changes it would have appeared Green when I
> first Opened this Post.  My suggestion would be to go ahead and 'save'
> the changes and rest comfortably that it will have no negative effect
> whatsoever.

Thank you for the clarification. I have just done that and saved the change.

> 
> Others will surely disagree with me and should appear here shortly.

Well, not really, since David Shaw concurs:
David Shaw wrote the following on 4/5/06 9:38 PM:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Charly Avital wrote:
>
>> I have chosen to quit without saving any changes, because the truth is I
>> do not fully understand what the change is, and what it would do to my
>> key and/or to my signing subkey.
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/faq/subkey-cross-certify.html
>
> You should do it.
>
> David

I have also uploaded the 'corrected' key to a keyserver.


Thanks to all.
Charly

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: GnuPG for Privacy
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=uNwC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----