1.4.3 // proper syntax for --edit-key cross-certify ?
David Shaw
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Thu Apr 6 17:03:44 CEST 2006
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:51:32AM -0400, vedaal at hush.com wrote:
> >Message: 6
> >Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:02:16 -0400
> >From: David Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com>
> >Subject: Re: 1.4.3 // proper syntax for --edit-key cross-certify ?
>
> >PGP does not generate signing subkeys. You generated a RSA
> >encryption
> >key that happened to be without key flags (I guess that version of
>
> >PGP
> >didn't use them yet), and so it appears as a RSA sign+encrypt key
> >in
> >GnuPG.
>
> well,
> it is an 'atypical' pgp build ;-)
>
> but the subkey is recognized by gnupg as a 'signing' subkey,
> and moreover, is 'forced' by gnupg front ends to be used for
> signing
> (there is no '!' indicator available to put as an option in
> gpg.conf)
PGP generated keys are not any different than GPG generated keys in
this regard. Go ahead and use a ! if you like.
David
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list