Back signatures (was Re: [Announce] First release candidate for
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Fri Feb 17 18:26:09 CET 2006
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:18:17PM +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
> On Friday 17 February 2006 04:44, David Shaw wrote:
> > * Added support for signing subkey "back signatures". Requiring
> > back signatures to be present is currently off by default, but
> > will be changed to on by default in the future, once more keys
> > contain the back signature. A new "backsign" command in the
> > --edit-key menu can be used to update signing subkeys with back
> > signatures.
> Is the backsign command of 1.4.3rc1 stable enough to provide existing
> keys with a back signature?
> Are there any PGP implementations that have problems with keys
> containing such a signature?
I don't know of one. Any PGP program that doesn't ignore unknown
noncritical signature subpackets would be pretty broken.
More information about the Gnupg-users