failure notice

[Mica Mijatovic]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

    Was Mon, 02 Jan 2006, at 14:46:59 +0100,
    when Werner wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:49:23 +0100, Mica Mijatovic said:

>> <gnupg-users at gnupg.org>:
>> 217.69.77.222_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_550_Administrative_prohibition/

> The sending host is on one of the blacklists or the message has been
> rejected due to other reasons.  Without more information I can't tell
> the problem.

Thanks for the response, Werner, anyway. To my knowledge I wouldn't have
more informations, except perhaps the fact I suppose was the reason that
my mailer in the reply routine takes over the name of the sender of the
message I reply to, and puts after his name the address of the list in
the TO field.

Vedaal though does not use his name in address field but only naked/nude
address, so my mailer took over his address, placed it on the place for
the name, and added address of the list after. It made actually a form
thus which is not "standard", namely "address <address>" and it was
probably the syntax which confused the server.

I didn't notice this immediately, but later, after I did and had
corrected it myself and sent to the list again, my reply ahpilly
arrived. So I suppose it was the only reason.

- --
Mica
PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
                 in my "From|Reply To" field(s). ~~~
Famous last words: Don't unplug it, it will just take a moment to fix.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEVAwUBQ9VHjbSpHvHEUtv8AQOccggAk9f59fPTGEAam2yEw7Gu83P1HKQcsijj
Ndz+yiveiC5vnbuVtU6DzeBVTuHznuxTF9MoqaMfoiTYpFopFnro+/7lADQlNjKL
rOvdNv/94mdyGupeDY0jrH2NiJDiFWsFJzcXgFH3I1XJkFvx01NyfjjgNhAgq6tP
Y6uQj7fC1dK7Jf0Qky76v3rzb3RwrwV9iavRydEigzAfHX3+DngWEhj+B9mpsyQa
jiAZJViXI4uI6dsex8wAtPI0jj/2KU7lwvDl3hU5uGTOJqhSD226gvlu+7s+zQSN
Fri7yThaiLvepAhMmtgHzoXa/H3vk3mKobBzBinx8t6GqQnGYdVLXg==
=k0mw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----