OpenPGP vs. GnuPG (was: GPG and PGP Compatibility)
Michael Kallas
michael.kallas at web.de
Tue Oct 17 22:17:45 CEST 2006
Hi,
Conan Purves schrieb:
> Theoretically speaking, what is the difference between PGP and GPG? Is
> it just a different management tool handling the same encryption
> algorithm or is there some further translation between the two?
They are two tools sharing the principles of public-key encryption.
PGP was implemented first. Sadly being non-free, many people considered
it not usable for security tasks.
Thus, a Free Software implementation was started, that's GnuPG.
Further, a standard [1] was drafted so other tools could be created
which share the same principles. Or maybe this is nonsense and someone
can correct me. ;)
> Why does my Enigmail menu on Thunderbird say OpenPGP, but it is using the
> GnuGPG engine?
Should be answered above. :)
[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt
Best wishes
Michael
--
Nobody can save your freedom but YOU -
become a fellow of the FSF Europe! http://www.fsfe.org/en
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 374 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20061017/6f42657e/signature.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list