DSA2
Alphax
alphasigmax at gmail.com
Sun Sep 24 17:08:32 CEST 2006
Qed wrote:
> On 09/23/2006 03:15 PM, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> [..snip..]
>> So my point is: what is the real advantage of "DSA2" over RSA
>> (if any, beside being the US standard)?
> Smaller, much smaller, signatures(on certification this is a desiderable
> property).
>
> [..snip..]
>> And therefore, even better, what is the present status of adding to
>> GnuPG an "official" ECC keys support?
> ECC are not part in RFC2440 nor there's a plan to include them.
You're wrong.
9.1. Public Key Algorithms
ID Algorithm
-- ---------
1 - RSA (Encrypt or Sign)
2 - RSA Encrypt-Only
3 - RSA Sign-Only
16 - Elgamal (Encrypt-Only), see [ELGAMAL]
17 - DSA (Digital Signature Standard)
18 - Reserved for Elliptic Curve
19 - Reserved for ECDSA
20 - Elgamal (Encrypt or Sign)
21 - Reserved for Diffie-Hellman (X9.42,
as defined for IETF-S/MIME)
100 to 110 - Private/Experimental algorithm.
--
Alphax
Death to all fanatics!
Down with categorical imperative!
OpenPGP key: http://tinyurl.com/lvq4g
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 569 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20060925/b5b1cd7f/signature.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list