comment and version fields.
kloecker at kde.org
Mon Apr 2 23:07:14 CEST 2007
On Monday 02 April 2007 17:34, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:15, randux at Safe-mail.net said:
> > No, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not concerned with the
> > technical user who posts a question to a news list and understands
> > the issue. I'm wondering about the non-technical (business) user
> > who gets a plug-in for his email client and then misinterprets a
> > modified signature block that someone tampered with.
> Proper MUAs clearly mark the signed part(s) of a message. For
> instance, checkout KMail (or Gnus).
Moreover, at least in KMail the comment and version headers are not even
shown to the user. So there's no way the user could be lead into
thinking they belonged to the signed text/data.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20070402/2086c033/attachment.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users