Keyserver refresh period after gpg --send-keys
jharris at widomaker.com
Thu Feb 22 20:41:32 CET 2007
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:33:38PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 17:51:02 Jason Harris wrote:
> > Specifically, these were in a batch update from SKS to onak/OpenPKSD/pks/
> > etc. (all times are TZ=UTC):
> > 2007-02-18 23:02:27.870255691 display_new_sig: new sig 71 by 2E604D51
> > added to 2E604D51 Bruno Costacurta <bruno at costac... 2007-02-18
> > 23:02:27.870319946 display_new_sig: new sig 72 by 2E604D51 added to
> > 2E604D51 pubmb02 <pubmb02 at skynet.be>
(NB: Nothing new has been seen by keyserver.kjsl.com since this entry.)
> Well, I still cannot see any refresh of my keys...sent 4 days ago.
> Should I try again ?
Yes, you need to. None of the 45 keyservers I just checked had anything
to add to your key.
keyserver.ganneff.de, currently part of subkeys.pgp.net, isn't
SKS-synchronizing right now, but it does email kjsl.com and didn't have
anything new either.
Right now, your full key in binary form hashes (SHA-1) to:
144278d5c7c4b138b76800333fe372bff355ee2c 2127 ./keyserver.kjsl.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2E604D51.gpg
e17306f3a61d468ad4a436b727c64461a7d4b604 2127 ./gpg-keyserver.de/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2E604D51.gpg
the latter matching on all the SKS servers I checked, except:
c751fdc463fae7f9525b5ab62a29439f9107683c 1735 ./keyserver.ganneff.de/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2E604D51.gpg
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20070222/5d30127a/attachment.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users