Why a subkey?
sven at radde.name
Sat Feb 24 19:55:58 CET 2007
Robert J. Hansen schrieb:
>> If so, why was (sign and encrypt) not offered as an option?
> Having one key that can be used for both signing and encryption
> operations is thought by some to be bad crypto policy. The problems
> with it appear to be mostly theoretical, though.
If you use "gpg --expert --gen-key", it will offer the selection:
(7) RSA (set your own capabilities)
This lets you choose a key which can be used for signing and encrypting.
Anyway, if there's a question "Why a subkey?", its partner-question
would be: "Why not?"
More information about the Gnupg-users