PGP messages getting flagged as spam

gabriel rosenkoetter gr at
Mon Oct 15 07:54:34 CEST 2007

At 2007-10-13 19:52 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb at> wrote:
> Has anyone tried contacting the SA developers about this? It seems like 
> something fairly straightforward for them to add.

"The SA developers" is a misconceived phrase here.

You're interested in the party who wrote widely desseminated rules
that happened to match PGP-enciphered messages (and it's likely to
be several parties each and different parties for PGP/MIME- and
clear-signed messages and for enciphered messages, whether ASCII-
encoded  or not).

It's up o the site administrator to make use of SA rules that aren't
braindamaged. It's hardly the fault of the authors of SA if some
site decides to add 2.5 points to every message with a MIME
attachment, though you can, perhaps, see how that might be a naive
approach that works pretty well most of the time.

gabriel rosenkoetter
gr at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20071015/da88f836/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list