GnuPG v2.x?

Robert J. Hansen rjh at
Wed Apr 9 21:44:22 CEST 2008

Paul wrote:
> So, I wondered, if KMail was the only MUA tested, then saying it is
> the only one that passed seems like a bit of semantic trickery, 
> inferring, as it does, that others failed.


If you're going to misquote someone, at least do it accurately.  The 
original poster's exact words were "is the only Free Software 
implementation of S/MIME that has passed the Sphinx interoperability tests."

The parse is ambiguous.  You can read it as meaning "only one Free 
Software implementation was submitted to Sphinx, and it passed".  You 
can read it as "other Free Software implementations were submitted to 
Sphinx, and only KMail passed".

Or you can do what I do, which is recognize that it's an ambiguous 
parse, and assume that the person speaking is a reasonable human being 
who is probably not engaging in semantic trickery.  Accusing people of 
malfeasance when there is no clear evidence any occurred is a 
McCarthyism into which I do not wish to fall.

Ingo is a reasonable human being.

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list