Naming of GnuPG
hidekis at gmail.com
Sat Apr 19 02:16:30 CEST 2008
How will version number convention will continue, as there are 1.4.x and
2.0.x lines concurrently running?
1.4.x line will be evolving on its own separately from 2.0.x line, right?
Just curious, because now it is at 1.4.9 and 2.0.9...
>From user's perspective, I think 1.4.x should be called something like
GnuPG Standalone, instead of having two different version numbers...
Well, I guess some programs go like 1.4.10, 2.0.10, etc., so this may
not be relevant at all!
More information about the Gnupg-users