Naming of GnuPG
John Clizbe
JPClizbe at tx.rr.com
Sun Apr 20 06:50:58 CEST 2008
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Matt Kinni wrote:
>> Basically, for a newbie, what is the difference between the two product
>> lines?
>
> GnuPG 2.0 adds S/MIME support, which is a totally different
> cryptographic standard than OpenPGP. If you need FOSS S/MIME, then you
> need GnuPG 2.0.
For those using Enigmail with Thunderbird/Seamonkey, 2.0.x is _only_ required if
one needs gpg-agent support.
--
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net
"what's the key to success?" / "two words: good decisions."
"what's the key to good decisions?" / "one word: experience."
"how do i get experience?" / "two words: bad decisions."
"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20080419/6d42cf1e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list