Naming of GnuPG
Christoph Anton Mitterer
christoph.anton.mitterer at physik.uni-muenchen.de
Sun Apr 20 12:37:07 CEST 2008
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 21:41 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Yes: that's the point I was making. Regular users are taught to think
> this. This is generally true. GnuPG is not following the regular
> versioning conventions.
Uhm what I mainly wonder is,... what is the main difference between
those two? Ok CMS support but that's not a difference between the shared
codebase, is it?
So in my opinion there are only rare cases where it's justified to have
different continuing branches (which are actually like forks). One
example is perhaps flex and flex-old..
More information about the Gnupg-users