Naming of GnuPG

Christoph Anton Mitterer christoph.anton.mitterer at
Mon Apr 21 15:42:52 CEST 2008

On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 09:30 -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> So, perhaps 1.4 should be GnuPG and 2.0 should be GnuPG-Plus.
> (Please, no "++"!)
I think that renaming would actually increase the confusion.
It would be better to consider to slowly phase out the 1.4x branch.


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list