Multiple clients

[Faramir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Harakiri escribió:
> Anyone else is really frightend by this question and prays that your bank is not part of those that this guy is consulting?

  Not me, and I don't see any reason to be afraid of using a bank that
wants to send encrypted messages to its customers... now, why a single
organization uses 5 different banks... I don't know, but I, by default
- -since I don't do business with that organization-, suppose there is a
legitimate reason for that. Of course my 'default' way of thinking is
different when it is me the one doing business...

  About the original question, I don't have an opinion about what is
better, so I won't try to give an answer.

  Best Regards

>> From: proxy <ganeshyz at XXXXXXX.com>
>> Subject: Multiple clients
>>
>> We have 5 bankers and we are going to receive encrypted
>> bank statements from
>> them. Now the question here is should we need to have
>> Separate Public Keys
>> for each bank (and corresponding Private keys) i.e. 5
>> different public keys 
>> OR for all the Bankers we are going to use one single
>> public key for our
>> whole orgranization?
....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJInBwaAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAda4IAIDnGBeo8Xp+tmtTUoVRpQou
yMOLObHEPAVGlTFbBD6M1YyRqIxNm8Obxz3Bxf8bAn0JOPq3iuD7/XUA1oD4ZKwq
CyWLWCt3BGfIWXIx5PHKuHhUBfDazKmH4hD/C2bwRD1vSH6Pt+kZYk0SS8n9hm9p
gk9F1+MKOZwXNd3QKEbfS9VZQJSn2jG9iV8pt+iG9SDNflnGJei1pBfMrvYHMjAu
t8E0J1qjYjv72WIoRQEJW6QjZWsUmY0QSy8R7LiHwXdRYZoBN6+3MHQm5rVCddKv
WKUwbuyvVDvDUzjef415KeEa+SbI22MB4PQczjC9xIdQli0b3X1l5jZVeYchEkE=
=1MPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----