new key // sorry, bad sig

[vedaal at hush.com]

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org wrote on
Thu Jan 24 21:09:48 CET 2008

> This list doesn't do such a thing. 
>Your messages arrived with a good 
>signature in my inbox.

yes,
in the e-mailing it is ok

i posted the second one long before the list's digest form of the e-
mail went out, and generally read the posts from the web, not by e-
mail

viewing the first post on the gnupg website:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-
January/032439.html

the sig is bad,
and it is because of the protection of the e-mail addresses against 
spammers, changing the address form to <vedaal at hush.com>
(btw, a considerate measure,
but one which requires posters to be aware of it when clearsigning 
a post that includes an e-mail address)

sorry for the double posting


--
Click here to lower your monthly payments.  Act now and save!
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4fRfjQIC4q25BCkBZDfJbugQlAytmgIGy7WJocbRCoto5ckv/
vedaal