Need recommendation on keyserver code

[Alan Olsen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



Todd Zullinger wrote:

> Alan Olsen wrote:
>> Those patches do not fix my build problems.  (It is running out of 
>> memory compiling numerix.ml.)

>Odd.  I built it again before sending the patches, on an up to date Fedora 8 box (i386).
> It did compile.  I didn't test any further though.

I believe the problem has to do with the version of OCAML I am using.  3.10.1 seems to have problems.  3.10.2 has been released. I am going to try that.  I am also using x86_64 and that may have something to do with it.

>> Your patches are also for a much earlier version of numerix.

>Yeah, the numerix patch was against the version of numerix included in the sks tarball. 
> Packaging numerix and making sks use the system numerix would be better (if possible),
> but it wasn't something I looked at.

The patch takes a bit to apply.  The code still needs patching at that point in the code. The code location has changed quite a bit though.

>> I have sent mail to the SKS author to see if he has any ideas.

>Good luck.  :)

Probably need it.  It has been a chore to get anything working with SKS.  Probably since I am using a version of Fedora 9 out of Rawhide...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wsBVAwUBSCN1f2qdmbpu7ejzAQrcSAgAvNsY4zSZafIfUOqUzmGl2jzm0ILGUwJT
Gg3VrWAT4e8AEquCy2OBablfjM81sLkeB3D9SAHLYxInnB67JpKHLyKzBY7KcKXD
TawOZRMuKLUqTTK7Ripj3VRFYLOKa7pflbxzpAHUuejbJMD1A7fGw+fyyJZuXxE3
/ur9XFUp0l1NdDbPzULbpau37/5x6d+kK01KnZRBi/9hEDGRH4j0RhAUKkXTzszX
sNqwa1KhySO9V7uv8miRK6qxsSEGdrnABdF+ILCj4ywo01FoKc1koSU+/asz4Fxt
68h+mJ3LOUeadRcJr7NvB/qb/Z58l1T8zgNYlJW1D+8ZjFxz0ehQqA==
=56nO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----