add subkey vs generate new set?
Werewolf
werewolf6851 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 00:01:22 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Another Pondering as every year need bigger bit sized keys to be secure
Benefits and Cons
Wondering if adding a bigger encryption/signing sub keys to current key
on keyserver leaves the benefit keeping the same finger print? So don't
have inform all your corresondences to get a new key from you? They
just have --refresh their public keyrings
Over
Just setting old key to expire and Generate a new set, collect
signatures again, change info on web pages and/or bussiness cards?
- --
Werewolf
=======================================
http://spandex31095.tripod.com/
Skype: Werewolf6851
===== Instant Messenger Accounts ======
Yahoo: lover_of_lycra
ICQ: 304325894
MSN: lover_of_lycra at hotmail.com
AIM: LycraloverWolf
=======================================
GPG key 76E6C1BC with following fingerprint
D508 2C9D B3A9 2F0E E472 95A8 2D8C B9E6 76E6 C1BC
=======================================
Inara: "What should I do?"
Simon: (hands her bandages): "Tie it off."
Inara: "Simon, I'm good with anatomy, but not like this..."
--Unfilmed Episode, "Dead or Alive"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Portable Thunderbird version 2.0.0.17 (20080914)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkj3ubIACgkQLYy55nbmwbxmAgCdETbweCy8Yz4ST+r6peRJPnqD
EHUAoMtPtPKg3ntgrPxvxcVfiAdwCRER
=i70a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list