Two convicted in U.K. for refusal to decrypt data

John W. Moore III jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net
Thu Aug 13 16:51:18 CEST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Reference:
>> From:		the dragon <ceprn at hotmail.com> 
> 
>> And if you look at the cases reported, these are not system admins refusing to divulge data, or even regular people trying to protect their privacy - they are child molestors and wanna-be terrorists.
> 
> Bollocks, To be charged is not necessarily to be guilty, The concept
> of fair trial & presumend innocent until found guilty in a court
> of Law, must preceed assuming pronoun "convicted" applies to each charged.

Just another example of the thinking that says 'The Police wouldn't have
charged Him/Her if they weren't guilty.'  Not the sort of person You'd
want on Your Jury; but probably a neighbor, friend, etc.  This attitude
is held by the vast majority of 'all people'.  :(

JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Thursday 13 Aug 2009, 10:50  --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn5068: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Personal Web Page:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJKhChkAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPNnQH/RQZKvkYc9et26rmKfp+snIZ
iHh7EPTjDafjuZ5DJYVDMvU/iEWPRLFEhnjgods574zv2jh0ZqbPp5DqbfLTvx3Y
ZPh48DKz53exnF2tcJ4xnRPE2ZRTnKUED0LKd0nD9X2Ddj4Bz8XekvvRmcWdAtE3
CQXNb/AXBjN9NEtqnnR7aUJTHIsfjR2OT4Yw+dJkV3tgAQt7nHXvEx7mQjgAV6bP
M/KzB5ZxkdJYee5RAntjENQBTSh5+T9HN/4x2tHk/dtd5Tdd6J1LGdR5cFzEsxPw
zRYRAcurr/X0pzhlvgoWYHO2z/n2Z9FCgMxPaQxxtIsdvQACADPyLg+2yU0OsM4=
=3PGd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list