Hibernation and secret keys

Christoph Anton Mitterer christoph.anton.mitterer at physik.uni-muenchen.de
Wed Feb 11 23:04:56 CET 2009

On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:00 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> If the answer is "Yes", then you're not protecting very much.  You did
> not succeed in doing what you were trying to do.  If the answer is
> "No", you at least avoided the usual pitfalls.
Yep,... you're right =)

It should be really possibly to make this very secure, but one has to
know what one does. (As always ^^)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3387 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090211/a8c57d31/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list