FW from PGP-Basis: newbie question about bad keys

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org
Mon Feb 16 22:45:17 CET 2009

On Monday 16 February 2009, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:48, faramir.cl at gmail.com said:
> >> The "signatures not checked" seems pretty self explanatory.  What
> >> does the bad signatures mean?
> The signed data does not match the signature.  That is the signed
> data or the signature has been modified or the signature was not
> correctly created initially.

What if the signing key is expired or has been revoked?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090216/cb40c10d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list