compatibility of Gnupg-1.4.9 to Gnupg-1.0.6

Anne Wilson cannewilson at googlemail.com
Sat Jan 24 09:19:03 CET 2009


On Saturday 24 January 2009 04:59:29 David Shaw wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2009, at 5:17 AM, rahul kaushik wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have an issue which is described below:
> >
> > earlier i was using Gnupg-1.0.6 for my appliaction. Now i have
> > replaced it
> > with Gnupg-1.4.9.
> > I am facing some issue related to keyrings. As per my application.
> > I need to perform following application.
> >
> > I did finally get these encrypt/decrypt procedures to work:
> >
> > 	gpg (1.0.6) for encryption followed by gpg (1.4.9) for decryption
> >        gpg (1.4.9) for encryption followed by gpg (1.0.6) for
> > decryption
> >
> > 	But for that i have to use same ( gnupg-1.0.6 ) keyrings file for
> > both
> > situations.
>
> In the GPG tarball, in the "tools" directory, there is a script
> "convert-from-106".  Run it, and you should be in better shape.
>
Is this something that all of us with old keyrings need to do?  If so, can you 
please either point us to instructions that a user could follow, or explain 
how to do it?  Thanks.

I'm wondering if that is part of the problems I've been having lately.

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090124/d8bb8622/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list