Public key crypto by hand
mearns.b at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 20:12:45 CEST 2009
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Brian Mearns<mearns.b at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:02 PM, gerry_lowry (alliston ontario canada
> (705) 250-0112)<gerry.lowry at abilitybusinesscomputerservices.com>
>> Robert wrote in part that "We've known since '99 that Solitaire is weak, thanks to the work of Paul Crowley".
>> It was, however, sufficient as a plot device in "Cryptonomicon".
>> Even simple systems like pig-latin are sufficient as long as they are more sophisticated than those
>> from whom one wishes to safeguard information.
> Thanks, Gerry. I'm familiar with the system and the book (which was
> excellent). But Bruce Schneier still claims on this site that the
> cipher is reasonable strong, and now that I've heard otherwise I'm
> seeking more information.
Replying to myself, I found Crowley's site detailing the bias in
I only really have a basic understanding of crypto, nothing deeply
mathematical enough to understand how this actually effects the
strength of the cipher. Would anyone care to explain this at all?
Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption:
Key Id: 0x3AA70848
Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net
More information about the Gnupg-users