Key Transition Letter 2009-05-21

Raimar Sandner mail at
Thu May 21 15:31:17 CEST 2009

On Thursday 21 May 2009 15:15:18 Raimar Sandner wrote:
> I believe (an I think others do too) it is good praxis to not sign new keys
> even if you have signed the old one and the new key is signed by the old
> one, without personally checking with the keyholder first. After all, the
> new key could have been compromised.

After all the _old_ key could have been compromised, that is what I meant :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090521/fd3d6438/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list