[OT] spam avoidance via IP-based filtering at the MTA [was: Re: Keyserver spam example]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Thu Jun 10 18:22:07 CEST 2010

On 06/10/2010 11:57 AM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an RFC that 
> clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP addresses. Therefore 
> they can not be considered valid.

Please cite this RFC.  All IP addresses are "dynamic" in some sense --
you cannot guarantee that the same organization or entity will control
them in a few years' time.

This is now sufficiently off-topic for gnupg-users, so i'm not going to
reply on this thread anymore.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 892 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20100610/75d63f98/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list