key question

MFPA expires2010 at ymail.com
Mon Mar 8 02:33:27 CET 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi David


On Sunday 7 March 2010 at 5:53:51 PM, you wrote:


> On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:46 AM, MFPA wrote:

>> (And yes, I know gpg now
>> allows you to omit the email address without having to use --expert,
>> but you are still asked for it.)

> There is no 'now' here.  This is not new behavior in GPG, and the
> expert flag never had anything to do with it (indeed, the behavior
> predates the existence of the --expert flag).  When GPG asks you for
> an email address, just hit return.  GPG doesn't care one way or the other.


Sorry, I was mistaken.

When I tested this in an earlier version, I was unable to proceed
without entering an email address. Having gone back and re-tested, I
am only able to replicate the behaviour if the string I enter for
"Real name" contains the "@" character. This also holds true for
1.4.10. The --expert flag was/is not the difference, it's the presence of "@"
in the "Real name" field.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2010 at ymail.com

Raining cats and dogs is better than hailing taxis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBS5RUBKipC46tDG5pAQoU1QP/ZLjFmEuJDekgAMUakhZdYPOvVEc/fOml
JSJT/ABumMQnnrwMA8JM/r3uoqguXP2HNC4fx2cL5OwcPGbb1kC5JPXwFG79JHKC
CTPM7aXVzOgavQ8L3fj1FKwM/6fOKXTFT/PLePYHIzbt4+HjxZk854bvTyhv3MY0
0qhoUy5yAaU=
=ypXx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list