Using the OTR plugin with Pidgin for verifying GPG public key fingerprints
Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Sun Mar 14 03:38:43 CET 2010
On 3/13/10 8:06 PM, erythrocyte wrote:
> Umm.. if I understand the nature of the probability tests or
> calculations just mentioned above
If person A and person B disagree on whether something is fake, the
operating assumption is that it's fake. The burden is on the person
claiming it's *not* fake to persuade the person claiming it *is* fake
that they're wrong.
Alan: "Hey, Bill, did you see this ID? It looks fishy."
Bill: "It looked good to me."
Alan: "It doesn't look good to me."
Bill: "Okay. Let me show you why I thought it was good, and let's take
it from there..."
> And besides, even if the above weren't true, how do I know that
> someone who does have that thought will make sure to check with others
> at the keysigning party?
There is a word for someone who keeps their mouth shut about fake IDs at
keysigning parties. That word is *conspirator*.
If you're assuming everyone else at the keysigning party is a
conspirator, then sure, you're out of luck. But in that case, you were
out of luck before you even stepped in the door.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5598 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Gnupg-users