On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 3/21/10 5:59 PM, Paul Richard Ramer wrote: >> I believe that you meant SHA-1 and not SHA-128, because there isn't a >> hash called SHA-128. > > There is, although the name is unofficial and not widely used. And more specifically, it is not used in OpenPGP or GnuPG. David