Keylogers

MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org
Thu Apr 28 20:28:49 CEST 2011


> ----- Message from Mike Acker <Mike_Acker at charter.net> on Thu, 28 
> Apr 2011 10:49:13 -0400 -----
> 
> To:
> 
> "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh at sixdemonbag.org>
> 
> cc:
> 
> gnupg-users at gnupg.org, Faramir <faramir.cl at gmail.com>
> 
> Subject:
> 
> Re: Re: Keylogers
> 
> On 14:59, Robert J. Hansen wrote: 
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:56:19 -0400, Mike Acker <Mike_Acker at charter.net>
> wrote:
> 
     <snip>
> we shoud recognize that this inventory process is most critical for 
> the operating software itself: the software that is allowed to run in 
RING0.
> 
> In a properly secured O/S an application program can't do any damage
> to its host O/S.
     <snip>

"In a properly secured O/S an application program can't do any damage"

No damage, yes.  But additional alterations can happen.  Software 
installations alter the base O/S--especially the Windows registry.  Keep 
in mind things such as Anti-virus software need to put in hooks to 
intercept normal/original processing to test files/programs.

I've wondered how this same subject works with application whitelisting.

Also, I believe device drivers still run in RING0 on Windows.  Although I 
haven't heard/checked whether that's still true in Windows 7.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110428/35121000/attachment.htm>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list