supersede key on key-server
Mike Acker
Mike_Acker at charter.net
Mon Aug 22 18:44:51 CEST 2011
On 08/22/2011 12:03, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> I was wondering something similar. I have a few keys which I have
> invalidated and disabled but there is no way to delete them. I am using
> this new key which I have not uploaded because if something happens and
> I must re-create the key that will too become just clutter on the server.
>
> On 22/08/2011 10:39 AM, Mike Acker wrote:
>> > some of us use more than one email address. with GPG it is simple to add
>> > a secondary ID to a key and this seems to work quite well.
>> >
>> > when a change like this is made it is desirable to update the keyserver.
>> > what happens when you re-upload a key to the keyserver? I hate to think
>> > the keyserver gets loaded up with old junk keys no one want used anymore...
>> >
you could upload a revoke certificate. hopefully they keyserver is smart
enough to discover multiple hits on a given fingerprint as a result of a
search... it would need to first search for the key by whatever search
text was provided, and then search for hits on the fingerprint... if
there is a revoke cert then you want to return that. if they key was
superseded by a later update it should provide the last updated copy.
interestingly they keys have a valid from/to date range, but no revision
date... we may have to just carry out some experiments
--
/MIKE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110822/89d794d1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list