Keys over 4096-bits
Ben McGinnes
ben at adversary.org
Fri Aug 26 15:36:17 CEST 2011
On 26/08/11 11:05 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Actually the primary keys are the most worry some.
That's a shame.
> I have a one 8k key in my keyring
So do I, but it's mine and it is not used for correspondence at all.
> and checking the key signatures made but that key takes a noticeable
> time.
I had hoped that it would only be the subkeys that resulted in the
performance hit (when checking message/file signatures, encrypting and
decrypting).
> Imagine everyone would use such keys and also consider that nowadays
> more and more low-processing power devices are used.
A good point.
> Such keys are at best a political statement and a good laugh for
> some NSA folks.
Probably not just the NSA. ;)
Regards,
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110826/56a6ae91/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list