On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:47, lists at chrispoole.com said: > Is there a better way to get rid of these "errors"? Yes, use gpg2. Using gpg and gpg-agent is just a kludge. gpg2 requires gpg-agent and thus we don't need those messages there anymore. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.