Quieten gpg-agent output?

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Fri Dec 16 15:07:59 CET 2011

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:47, lists at chrispoole.com said:

> Is there a better way to get rid of these "errors"?

Yes, use gpg2.  Using gpg and gpg-agent is just a kludge.  gpg2 requires
gpg-agent and thus we don't need those messages there anymore.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list