Default hash

[Faramir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

El 26-02-2011 0:27, Aaron Toponce escribió:
> On 02/25/2011 07:39 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Bruce himself recommends AES over TWOFISH.
> 
> [citation needed]
> 
> I know that he's recommended AES-128 over AES-256, but I've not read
> where he's recommended AES over TWOFISH.

  There is an interview somewhere (I was looking for it to provide
citation, but I was unable to find it. I think it used to be in his blog).

  He said something like "use AES, that is the standard, and no one is
fired for using AES", but that doesn't mean AES is better, it just mean
it is safer (for you) to be able to say "I used the standard, it was not
my fault...". But he also said something suggesting that for personal
stuff, maybe you should consider using other things (but again, he
didn't said explicitly "for personal stuff I recommend Twofish").

  But that was before vulnerabilities were discovered in AES-256 and
AES-192. I have no idea what he would recommend now.

  If you find the interview, please post the link, I was unable to find it.

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNaNrFAAoJEMV4f6PvczxARikH/3c2EheWVWz0ee59+oVoXnHE
dQCXc89pT3Wa+75adlacyyQL8RTXYsR4M3IDbrzS3GTTtm5qjtiO0VCsd3FiuWw6
dLk/h401PvAAGyznpK/saSHX+3wAd6I40z0L3RyPa+mtvCzWLLnEGAYg9KEOcGbS
oUT8IEHHCXtoxC02F9opoljX7TKXPdRds0SfIfrl1jnuAaid3AgnYld1psfvyQQK
Ip1FouX5OaL1j/gWc68WgUnH9FHtrnjyM32qXCnkQEI91o2BGQoIN0E/7S0SDyze
MM9oFDckXi6YGl4hLE63G2S5CLtlCLjUpBsZuoB7dYhiIp9wVAM/2yGHFk/NGYQ=
=1hId
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----