Default hash

[Faramir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

El 26-02-2011 15:59, Simon Ward escribió:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:49:41AM -0300, Faramir wrote:
...
>>   There is an interview somewhere (I was looking for it to provide
>> citation, but I was unable to find it. I think it used to be in his blog).
> 
> This one[1]?  It doesn’t mention AES though… The topic was discussed on
> this list a couple of years ago (and probably many other times)[2].
> 
> [1]: http://www.schneier.com/news-048.html

  Right, my fault, as always I mixed things. But the following link the
the one
> [2]: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-September/034622.html

  Here he says Twofish has speed comparable with AES, without some
vulnerabilities (but Serpent is considered even more secure). However,
he says if AES fails, you won't be blamed for using it (so is the safest
for your career). If you chose Twofish, and it is broken, you will be
blamed for choosing it

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNaXAyAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAvTsH/i2Lf4Fg3fhIFfWQv6286PxF
W3l23IqRHiBnmuoTN2t1iv4CDR0yro/w/qoj/c4+oTSFklXt8d+jFepcUkwqc2O1
jhBDsWx/6e2W9j/G6ApyO76w1F8JiAsN84IQZGLMQ3qgbTKt/7oAwuF540ZDVX3C
2lNaOZeegj7xnNfLwUPgTzGnM1qDSHNhne+wk82jUPSD0xfEm7ILZbr7aomdkGL1
31Bw5WwXucG4RkW3UlOHFi0EG+MKtUBbA5frx5JPzjMPFrT29rH3+pEa92SbLpKk
m6V3fv/jIrSagNauFZWr8odRp/vFWypf6o94rsMor7j9oKm6NZCcVEczEnWQhCs=
=YgI5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----