PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile

[Avi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Why? Inline is simple and effective. I'm curious as to why you
feel MIME is so much better.

- --Avi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs

iJgEAREKAEAFAk1psE85GGh0dHA6Ly9wZ3AubmljLmFkLmpwL3Brcy9sb29rdXA/
b3A9Z2V0JnNlYXJjaD0weEY4MEUyOUY5AAoJEA1isBn4Din5lgMA/AwKVfy+zUNF
fXBiFZ47w1AFMs8s5VNr6t8P7Jg6/H74AP9ju6yMftOZH3Ee5v7ZQfCnQ3OlkwuR
+fgcgWT+PCJuzA==
=HdOG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


----
User:Avraham

pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key) <avi.wiki at gmail.com
>
   Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC  ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9


From: Martin Gollowitzer <gollo at fsfe.org>
> To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:56:21 +0100
> Subject: Re: PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile (Jameson Rollins)
> * Avi <avi.wiki at gmail.com> [110225 19:21]:
> > For those of us who use webmail, inline signatures are rather
> > useful.
>
> There are webmail applications supporting PGP/MIME. If yours doesn't, it
> is not a good one. Inline signatures are not a good thing IMHO.
>
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110226/9a27febb/attachment.htm>