PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at
Sun Feb 27 21:11:02 CET 2011

On Sunday 27 February 2011, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> David Tomaschik <david at> wrote:
> >How about "inline confuses users who don't know anything about
> >OpenPGP"?
> Meh. If anything, inline signatures sparked conversation.

Yeah. I think we should stop this pointless discussion. I doubt that any 
person was convinced one way or the other by this thread. Apparently, 
the message that started this thread was a gross overreaction as tests 
by others who couldn't reproduce the problem on multiple mobiles with 
multiple mail clients seem to show.

I will continue to sign my messages in blue.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110227/97a5ead8/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list