PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile
MFPA
expires2011 at ymail.com
Mon Feb 28 22:59:08 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 28 February 2011 at 3:02:08 AM, in
<mid:010B72F5-DCB7-4877-A955-92CA0998B706 at jabberwocky.com>, David Shaw
wrote:
> It is reasonable
> that if someone was being masqueraded, that person
> would speak up and challenge the forger (e.g. "Hey,
> you're not Martin! I'm the real Martin, and I can
> prove it by signing this message with the same key I've
> used all along....").
In John, John and Rob's experiment (if I understand correctly) they
didn't post as each other, they simply all signed messages with the
same secret key. I'm sure Martin would have something to say *if* he
spotted his key's signature on messages he didn't write...
- --
Best regards
MFPA mailto:expires2011 at ymail.com
Roses smell better than onions but don't make such good soup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNbBqznhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf
a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC
OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB
MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pSWAD/32O
hF3Ikmifx9fVM3AuXKJghTFT7fNguLnwBpOVtr/B9+766eiouDeaI2RoAehXlA7o
mMSmEJkXZHmNparysRNmWwwJJxXnoc/Va5n1X6pzeSN4V1fDuBKwfPsOJUWqER2g
NcjqB8+GwH5AQseBka3SLoCQbSLzj+QdL4Gz4Bx5
=1qnL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list