Problem with faked-system-time option
mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Wed Jun 15 10:56:21 CEST 2011
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 03:16:16 schrieb Jerome Baum:
> So, um, let's just start using a non-standardized notation in the "@"
> namespace and then wait for standardization?
A good procedure.
> We just need to agree on
> a name, maybe Werner can confirm we are free to use
> "timestamp-only at gnupg.org"? What would the value mean?
Shall I repeat the proposal, or is that a question to Werner? :-)
"The signer makes no statement about the content of the signed data (may not
even have been able to read it) but only confirms its existance at the time of
the given timestamp."
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Gnupg-users