Problem with faked-system-time option

Hauke Laging mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Wed Jun 15 12:36:33 CEST 2011


Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 12:23:40 schrieb Jerome Baum:

> I was referring to the value of the notation. We can set any value so
> maybe use it for different "levels" of timestamping (like
> certification levels)? Or just blank/null?

What would that refer to? You don't have to confirm the current time, do you? 
I don't think that there is a need for high precision time stamps. A statement 
about the accuracy might be part of the signature policy.


Hauke
-- 
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110615/2d2d9033/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list